Make learning comfortable
SAT Math: Extension Workshops / LEVEL 1 · DIFFICULTY 3/5
SAT: Statistical Evidence
Focused SAT extension practice.
Choose a node to explore its lesson.
STAGE SAT 1.1 · 8 PRACTICE PROBLEMS · 4 NEW-CONTEXT APPLICATIONS
Estimates & Margin of Error
Useful preparation: Samples, Population Estimates & Limits
Goal: Build and interpret an estimate interval, and explain how sample size changes sampling uncertainty.
Before you begin: Sampling, percentages and data displays.
A separate example: estimate , starting margin 10 percentage points. Keep the confidence level and sampling method fixed.
; approximate margin=10 percentage points. Quadrupling n halves the margin. A biased sample can still give a narrow, misleading interval.
Understand the idea
A sample estimate is not the population value. An estimate p with margin m gives the interval . For a percentage, m is in percentage points, not a percent of p.
Choose and justify a method
At the same confidence level and with otherwise comparable random samples, the margin is approximately proportional to . Four times as many observations roughly halves the margin. This approximation does not remove selection bias.
Check the conditions
confidence procedure captures the fixed population parameter in about of repeated samples under its assumptions. It does not say that of individuals lie inside this interval or guarantee that this particular interval contains the parameter.
A random-sample estimate with a margin of error of 4 percentage points. What is the upper endpoint, as a percent? Enter the number without %.
- Use estimate plus margin.
- Both quantities are percentage points.
- Upper endpoint = .
- This is ; the interval is an estimate, not a guarantee.
56
A school wants to enlarge a random survey of 500 people. To reduce the margin to one third at the same confidence level, approximately how many people are needed?
- A margin factor needs a square-root sample factor 3.
- Square the factor to get the sample-size multiplier.
- The sample size must be multiplied by .
- people.
4500
Common pitfalls
Possible mix-up: A margin of 3 means multiply the estimate by .
Add and subtract 3 percentage points when the margin is stated that way.
Possible mix-up: A larger convenience sample eliminates bias.
Random sampling supports population inference; size alone does not repair selection bias.
Explain it to yourself
Explain why your method works in estimates & margin of error. State one condition it needs and describe what can go wrong without that condition.
Preview the eight practice prompts
A random-sample estimate with a margin of error of 2 percentage points. What is the upper endpoint, as a percent? Enter the number without %.
An estimate interval from to . What is its margin of error in percentage points?
A study has a margin of 6 percentage points. With the same method and confidence level, it quadruples the random-sample size. Using the inverse-square-root approximation, what is the new margin?
A random sample contains 200 people. To reduce the margin to one third at the same confidence level, approximately how many people are needed?
A town survey estimates support at with a margin of error of 3 percentage points. What is the upper endpoint, as a percent? Enter the number without %.
A survey reports an interval for support from to . What is its margin of error in percentage points?
A polling team has a margin of 8 percentage points. With the same method and confidence level, it quadruples the random-sample size. Using the inverse-square-root approximation, what is the new margin?
A school wants to enlarge a random survey of 300 people. To reduce the margin to one third at the same confidence level, approximately how many people are needed?
STAGE SAT 1.2 · 8 PRACTICE PROBLEMS · 4 NEW-CONTEXT APPLICATIONS
Sampling, Experiments & Causal Claims
Useful preparation: Estimates & Margin of Error
Goal: Distinguish who was sampled from how treatments were assigned, and identify the conclusions a design supports.
Before you begin: Sampling, percentages and data displays.
Understand the idea
Random sampling selects participants from a target population. It helps justify generalizing to that population, provided nonresponse and measurement problems are controlled.
Choose and justify a method
Random assignment divides participants into treatment groups. It helps balance confounders and supports a causal comparison under a well-conducted experiment. Volunteers can be randomly assigned without being a random population sample.
Check the conditions
An observational association alone does not establish cause. Ask two separate questions: Were people randomly sampled? Were treatments randomly assigned? Neither a large sample nor a small margin of error replaces these design requirements.
A survey randomly samples 140 city residents and records reading time and grades without assigning treatments. Which conclusion type is supported? Enter 1 for population association only, 2 for causation only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
- Separate sampling from treatment assignment.
- The residents are randomly sampled but no treatment is assigned.
- Random sampling supports estimating an association for city residents.
- Without an experiment, that association alone cannot establish a causal effect. Choose 1.
1
A school website poll receives 360 voluntary responses about study time and scores, with no treatment assigned. Enter 1 for justified population generalization only, 2 for causation only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
- Voluntary response is not random sampling.
- There is also no random treatment assignment.
- Respondents may differ from people who did not respond.
- Neither broad population generalization nor a causal conclusion is justified by this design alone: 4.
4
Common pitfalls
Possible mix-up: Random assignment makes volunteers representative of everyone.
Assignment supports a treatment comparison; sampling determines the population to which it can be generalized.
Possible mix-up: An association proves one variable caused the other.
Observational associations may have confounders and do not by themselves establish causation.
Explain it to yourself
Explain why your method works in sampling, experiments & causal claims. State one condition it needs and describe what can go wrong without that condition.
Preview the eight practice prompts
A survey randomly samples 120 city residents and records reading time and grades without assigning treatments. Which conclusion type is supported? Enter 1 for population association only, 2 for causation only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
An experiment randomly assigns 60 volunteers to two study methods. Volunteers were not randomly sampled. Enter 1 for population generalization only, 2 for causal comparison among participants only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
A study randomly samples 200 students from its district and randomly assigns a tutoring method, with complete follow-up. Enter 1 for generalization only, 2 for causal comparison only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
A poll receives 300 voluntary responses about study time and scores, with no treatment assigned. Enter 1 for justified population generalization only, 2 for causation only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
A library survey randomly samples 130 city residents and records reading time and grades without assigning treatments. Which conclusion type is supported? Enter 1 for population association only, 2 for causation only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
A learning-app trial randomly assigns 64 volunteers to two study methods. Volunteers were not randomly sampled. Enter 1 for population generalization only, 2 for causal comparison among participants only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
A district study randomly samples 210 students from its district and randomly assigns a tutoring method, with complete follow-up. Enter 1 for generalization only, 2 for causal comparison only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.
A school website poll receives 320 voluntary responses about study time and scores, with no treatment assigned. Enter 1 for justified population generalization only, 2 for causation only, 3 for both, 4 for neither.

